Best WordPress to Next.js Migration Services in 2026, Compared Honestly

If you're shopping for a WordPress-to-Next.js migration, you'll notice something odd: most "best migration services" lists are written by one of the vendors on them, and few of them say so.

This one is too. Greeto Studio is on this list, and we wrote it. Our entry is clearly marked. Every fact about the other providers comes from their own websites, linked so you can check it, and we re-checked every one on 2026-10-01. The criteria are the ones we'd use if we were buying instead of selling. If another agency fits you better, this page should help you see that quickly.

Updated 2026-10-01. We re-checked the six original providers on their own pages and fixed what had changed: Matt Darm now publishes a timeline, Blazity moved its migration page, and we corrected details for Pagepro and webvise. We also added five providers that Google's AI Overview named for this search when we checked: INSYNC, PandaCodeGen, Pragma Code, ValeoFX and ztabs.

How we compared them

Migration vendors are hard to compare. Many don't publish prices, and most promise "zero downtime" and "no SEO loss." So we compared what you can check:

• Published pricing. Numbers on the site, or "contact us"? Prices appear exactly as each provider publishes them, in their currency.
• Stated timeline. What they commit to in public, not what sales says on a call.
• Proof before you sign. Can you see real output (an audit, a demo, a written quote) before you pay for the project?
• SEO-safety mechanics. Do they explain how rankings survive (a redirect map, route parity, metadata checks), or only promise that they will?
• Best for. The team and situation where each provider fits. This column is our read, not theirs.

The table runs A to Z. It is not a ranking.

The comparison at a glance

Prices and timelines as published on each provider's own page, checked 2026-10-01.

Below is the detail, grouped by the kind of site each provider fits, A to Z inside each group.

Small sites and fixed budgets

Matt Darm: UK packages with a paid consultation

Matt Darm is a UK studio based near Reading. It publishes three tiers: a £299 consultation, a £2,499 standard migration and £4,999+ for a full migration with custom features, all ex VAT. The standard tier includes a headless CMS (they usually recommend Sanity or Contentful), redirects and a month of support. Their FAQ now gives a timeline too: typically 6–12 weeks, confirmed after the audit.

What stands out: the £299 consultation covers an audit, a plugin review and a cost and timeline estimate. It's a cheap way to get a professional read before you commit to the build.

Worth asking: the page headlines "100% SEO kept" and "3x faster." Ask which sites those numbers come from and how they were measured.

Nandann Creative: package prices on the page

Nandann publishes three packages: Standard $1,700–4,000 (30 days of support), Premium $4,000–8,500 (60 days) and Enterprise $8,500+ (90 days). Timelines run from 1–2 weeks for simple sites and 3–6 weeks for medium ones to 2–4 months for complex sites. They say they've migrated 100+ WordPress sites, and the first step is a free consultation with a migration plan.

What stands out: real price ranges in a market that mostly hides them. That makes Nandann an easy first quote and a useful anchor when you read everyone else's proposals.

Worth asking: how a fixed tier handles scope surprises, because plugin-heavy WordPress sites rarely fit a package cleanly. They also promise "40–60% faster load times." Ask which sites that was measured on.

PandaCodeGen: low fixed prices with written test terms

PandaCodeGen sells fixed-price tiers: Starter from $1,500 (up to 7 pages, 1–2 weeks), Growth from $3,500 (8–20 pages with Sanity, 2–4 weeks) and Scale from $5,000 (more than 20 pages, WooCommerce or more than one language, 3–6 weeks). Every old URL is forwarded to its new page. The written quote names which pages must score 90+ on PageSpeed, on which device and tool, and it includes refund terms. A free PageSpeed audit needs no email, and a 30-minute call ends with a fixed quote.

What stands out: the written quote. It says what's in, what's out and how "passing" is measured. That's the right way to buy a migration from anyone.

Worth asking: they're young and say so. They launched in February 2026, and they've withdrawn one case study's speed figures until they re-measure them. Ask to see live migrated sites.

Pragma Code: WordPress stays as the editor

Pragma Code is a studio for the DACH region (Germany, Austria, Switzerland), led by its founder, Alexander Ohl. Its default setup keeps WordPress as a headless CMS behind a static Next.js front end, so editors keep the admin they know. Packages are fixed price: Essential €2,500–3,500 (about 1–2 weeks), Business €4,500–7,000 (about 3–4 weeks, for custom post types and integrations) and Enterprise from €9,500 (6+ weeks, for headless WooCommerce, logins or several languages). Step one is a free tech audit that tells you which package fits.

What stands out: the headless-WordPress default. If your team doesn't want to learn a new CMS, this keeps the change small.

Worth asking: headless WordPress still needs WordPress updates and hosting, so ask who looks after that side after launch. They lean on "proprietary automation tools." Ask what a person checks before launch.

Marketing sites scoped after an audit

ByteLogic: the running-cost argument

ByteLogic (England & Wales) leads with hosting economics. It compares a typical WordPress stack at £83–314 a month with about £20 a month on Vercel Pro after the move, and quotes each project after a free audit. The published process: audit (1–2 days), build on a private preview URL (1–2 weeks), review (3–5 days), a one-day switch, then 2–4 weeks of monitoring. That's typically 3–5 weeks end to end. The new CMS is Builder.io, and they also work white-label for agencies.

What stands out: honest safety design. WordPress keeps running for 2–4 weeks as a fallback, and DNS can be pointed back in minutes. That matches how we think about DNS cutover risk.

Worth asking: the £20 a month is infrastructure only. Get the project fee in writing at the audit stage.

Greeto Studio (us): read this one with that in mind

This is us, so judge accordingly. Our WordPress to Next.js migration service moves B2B and SaaS marketing sites to Next.js without losing the URLs, rankings and leads the old site earned. In plain words:

• We list every live URL and map each one to its new page with a tested 301 redirect. Nothing gets dumped on the homepage.
• We rebuild your templates in Next.js, keeping your design or refining it, and carry over every title, canonical and schema block.
• You choose where your team edits: WordPress kept as a headless editor, or content in the codebase.
• We switch DNS with a rollback plan, send a test lead through every form on launch day, and watch Search Console and your forms for 14 days.

Our line is "AI builds it fast. We make it great." In a migration, that means AI does much of the build and content move, and we check every route, redirect and tag by hand before anything goes live.

Here's what we can point to instead of adjectives. Our process is public: the migration playbook and the SEO migration guide describe each step, so you can hand them to any agency on this list and ask "do you do all of this?" And when we moved our own site from greeto.me to greeto.studio, we published the Search Console data from week one, including what lagged. To be clear, that was a domain move with unchanged paths, the easy kind of migration. It shows how we work and how open we are about results. It is not a WordPress rebuild.

We don't publish prices. We quote each migration after we've seen the actual site, because the cost depends on templates, content volume, plugins to rebuild and integrations (more on that in the FAQ below). For a scoped quote, book a call with Tal, our founder.

Best for: B2B and SaaS marketing teams that want AI-speed delivery with a senior engineer accountable for the result.

INSYNC: a published price floor, Astro by default

INSYNC is a German agency (EL Industries GmbH, per its imprint). Its WordPress-to-Next.js guide states the terms plainly: relaunch packages from €8,000 net, and 3–6 weeks to launch for a 10–30 page marketing site, followed by two weeks of monitoring with a 404 report and a ranking comparison. Content moves into Sanity. One detail to know: if your site has no logins, dashboards or data calculated per request, they build it in Astro instead of Next.js, with the same process.

What stands out: a clear six-phase process with a hard rule that no site goes live without a finished redirect map. Their own site, rebuilt off Wix in 2026, is the reference case, and they say openly that it's still building its rankings.

Worth asking: whether you'll get Next.js or Astro, and why. Both can be the right call. Just make sure it's a choice you agree with.

Pagepro: one stack, and a demo on your own content

Pagepro migrates to one destination only: Next.js on Vercel with Sanity. It charges a fixed price agreed after a free Migration Readiness Assessment: from $15,000, or from $30,000 for full data migration and complex content. A smaller architecture audit costs $1,500–2,500. The standard engagement is 4 weeks, built on their in-house starter, Nexity. They say they've done 20+ migrations with zero ranking drops.

What stands out: the 48-hour live demo built with your actual content, scheduled in week 1 while the scope is fixed. Seeing your own pages on the new stack early is strong proof. They also commit that if your site fits the standard 4-week scope, they keep working at no extra cost until it's production-ready.

Worth asking: whether Sanity fits your editors. The single-stack focus is why they're fast, and it's also a constraint if you wanted a different CMS. Also confirm whether the demo comes before or after you sign.

ValeoFX: risk controls spelled out

ValeoFX (Toronto, Canada) sells a WordPress to Next.js Migration Sprint from $3,500 for discovery and implementation, with 4–12 weeks depending on complexity. The deliverables are specific: a verified URL inventory, a redirect map, a cutover risk register, a staging crawl, metadata parity checks, form tests, a documented rollback plan and monitoring after launch.

What stands out: candor. Their FAQ says rankings can move after any migration and no one can guarantee unchanged traffic. It also says that if the problem is a slow theme or plugin debt, improving WordPress may be the better investment.

Worth asking: what the $3,500 sprint covers for your site and what a full migration adds. The page doesn't name the currency, and they're based in Toronto, so confirm whether it's USD or CAD.

webvise: AI-assisted, priced after discovery

webvise (Potsdam, Germany) rebuilds WordPress sites as static Next.js on Vercel, with a target of 90+ on PageSpeed. Pricing is estimated after discovery. The page header says 1–2 weeks, while the FAQ says 2–3 weeks for simple brochure sites and 4–6 for complex ones. They say you see a working prototype with your content by day three, and they list "AI-assisted content editing support" without much detail.

What stands out: an honest FAQ. They say rankings can move during a migration and focus on reducing that risk rather than promising it away.

Worth asking: which timeline applies to your site, and what the AI-assisted editing does in practice. Their MP Bau case study is a good place to start.

Large and enterprise sites

Blazity: the enterprise engineering house

Blazity (Warsaw, Poland) now leads with AI agents, and migration sits under its "Migration & Modernization" services. The migration page we linked in July now returns a 404. No prices are published. They say enterprise migrations "typically run a few months," and that one client project, CookUnity, took about three. They cite a WordPress case too: 15 WordPress sites for Iberion moved onto one shared Next.js setup.

What stands out: code you can read before you talk to sales. Their Next.js migration plugin (Claude Code agents, MIT license) and their next-enterprise boilerplate are public on GitHub. They also describe themselves as a Vercel Gold Partner, "one of 11 worldwide."

Worth asking: if you run a small marketing site, you're probably not their target customer, and the quote will likely reflect that.

ztabs: a full team and 60 days of monitoring

ztabs (Houston, Texas) publishes ranges in its FAQ: $15,000–25,000 for a simple marketing site, $25,000–50,000 for medium sites and $50,000–100,000+ for large content platforms. Timelines run 4–6 weeks under 100 pages, 6–10 weeks for 100–500 pages and 10–14 weeks for 500+ pages. Every migration includes 60 days of Search Console monitoring, and they offer headless WordPress if your editors want to stay in the WordPress admin. They say they've migrated 40+ WordPress sites.

What stands out: the 60-day monitoring window, and a detailed step-by-step migration guide you can use to check any vendor's plan.

Worth asking: the same page also shows a "boutique" range of $15,000–120,000 per engagement. Ask which range applies to your site, in writing.

How to choose (whoever you pick)

A migration is a controlled replatform, not a redesign, so the vendor's mechanics matter more than their portfolio. Whoever you talk to, ask these five questions:

1. Show me the redirect plan. Every old URL needs a mapped 301 before cutover. If they can't explain how they build the redirect map, walk away.
2. How do you prove route parity? How will they show that every indexed page exists on the new site: a sitemap diff, a crawl comparison, or hope?
3. What happens to my metadata and schema? Titles, canonicals and structured data drifting quietly is one of the most common ways migrations lose rankings.
4. What do I see before I sign? Pagepro's assessment, ByteLogic's audit, PandaCodeGen's written quote, Matt Darm's paid consultation, Pragma Code's free audit. Every serious provider offers some proof up front. "Trust us" isn't proof.
5. Who's watching after launch, and for how long? The first weeks after cutover are where problems show up. Stated monitoring windows on this list run from two weeks (INSYNC, and our own 14-day watch) to 60 days (ztabs). Monitoring belongs in the quote, not in an upsell.

One more: don't buy speed on the framework name. Next.js doesn't make a site fast by default. A well-built site is fast, on any platform, and you measure that per site. If speed matters to you, get the target in writing. PandaCodeGen's quote, for example, names which pages are tested, on which device and tool, and what counts as passing.

Still deciding whether to move at all? What the 2026 data says about WordPress lays out the case, including when staying put is the smarter call. And if you'd rather check the whole process yourself first, our WordPress-to-Next.js migration guide covers the full sequence. It's the same checklist we run.

FAQ

How much does a WordPress to Next.js migration cost in 2026?

Published prices on this page start at $1,500 (PandaCodeGen's Starter tier, up to 7 pages) and reach $100,000+ (ztabs, for large content platforms). In between: Nandann from $1,700, Matt Darm from £2,499, Pragma Code from €2,500, ValeoFX from $3,500, INSYNC from €8,000 net and Pagepro from $15,000, all checked October 1, 2026. Most providers, us included, quote after an audit. What actually moves the price: the number of page templates, how much content has to move, which plugins have to be rebuilt (forms, search, booking, memberships, a shop), the integrations (CRM, analytics, consent), how many languages, and whether the design changes too.

How long does a WordPress to Next.js migration take?

For a typical 10–30 page marketing site, published timelines cluster around 3–6 weeks to launch: Pagepro states 4 weeks, ByteLogic 3–5 including monitoring, and INSYNC 3–6 plus two weeks of monitoring. Small sites can take 1–2 weeks (Nandann for simple sites; PandaCodeGen and Pragma Code for their smallest tier). Some providers quote longer for a typical project: Matt Darm says 6–12 weeks. Bigger sites take longer: ztabs states 10–14 weeks for 500+ pages, and Blazity "a few months" for enterprise work.

Will migrating from WordPress to Next.js hurt my SEO?

It shouldn't, if route parity, 301 redirects and metadata are handled properly. Expect rankings to move for a few weeks even when the work is done right; ByteLogic and ztabs both say 2–4 weeks. Where they settle depends on the new site, not the framework. Next.js doesn't make a site faster or better ranked by default. The real risk is a vendor who skips the redirect map or launches with missing pages, which is why the questions above focus on mechanics rather than promises.

Can AI do the migration instead of an agency?

AI speeds up the mechanical parts: content extraction, template conversion and redirect generation. Several providers here say openly that they use it: Blazity (an open-source Claude Code migration plugin), PandaCodeGen (Claude and Cursor), Pragma Code (in-house automation tools), ztabs (AI-assisted extraction and visual comparison) and us. What AI doesn't replace is accountability. Someone still has to check route parity, test the redirects and own the launch. The useful question is whether the people supervising the AI show you their checks.

Can we keep WordPress as our editor?

Yes. That's a headless WordPress setup: your team keeps the WordPress admin, and Next.js serves the public pages. Pragma Code uses it by default, and ztabs, ValeoFX and we offer it. Others move your content to a headless CMS such as Sanity (Pagepro, INSYNC, PandaCodeGen), Builder.io (ByteLogic), or Sanity or Contentful (Matt Darm). Headless WordPress keeps the change small for editors, but you still have a WordPress install to update and host.